Charles married Aimée Clary ROGER on 1 Jul 1857 in Paris, Seine, France. Aimée (daughter of Jérôme François Édouard ROGER and Eleanor Mary COLYEAR) was born on 2 Nov 1837 in Paris 10e, Seine, France; and died. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Other Events and Attributes:

• Occupation: 1831; Avocat
• Occupation: 1832; Professeur d’histoire
• Occupation: 1840; Attaché au Ministère de l’Instruction publique

Jérôme married Eleanor Mary COLYEAR on 19 Aug 1829 in Saint James, Westminster, London, England. Eleanor (daughter of Thomas Charles COLYEAR and Harriet BISHOPP) was born on 8 Jul 1808; died on 15 Nov 1856 in Le Mans, Sarthe, France. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Notes:

François Roger, auteur dramatique et poète est né à Langres, le 17 avril 1776.
 À l’âge de 16 ans il fit et chanta des chansons qui amenèrent, pendant dix-sept mois, son incarcération et celle de sa famille. Fonctionnaire, il entra dans l’Université et publia des ouvrages de littérature scolaire ; il fut député sous l’Empire et la Restauration. Journaliste, poète et auteur dramatique, son chef-d’œuvre est une comédie en vers, en trois actes, L’Avocat
 Il fut élu à l’Académie le 28 août 1817 en remplacement de Suard, et reçu par le duc de Lévis le 30 novembre suivant. Son élection fut très critiquée. Il fit partie de la commission du Dictionnaire. Il combattit la proposition Lacretelle, reçut Villemain et le comte de Sainte-Aulaire et vota contre Victor Hugo. Il avait été l’un des compagnons du « Déjeuner de la Fourchette ».
 Il est mort le 1er mars 1842.

---

 François Roger voit le jour à Langres (Haute Marne), le 17 avril 1776. Fils de Didier Roger, receveur des décimes du diocèse de Langres, et Marie Joly, il commence ses études au collège de sa ville natale et les termine à Paris. De retour à Langres, il se compromet en composant des chansons contre-révolutionnaires. On l’emprisonne avec sa famille sous la Terreur, puis on le remet en liberté, après 17 mois de détention.
 Il revient étudier le droit à Paris, sous la direction de son oncle, Joly, ex-avocat au parlement. Mais il délaisse bientôt la procédure pour s’adonner à la littérature. Il devient attaché au ministère de l’Intérieur et est destitué, le 22 juin 1798, pour avoir lu en séance publique à l’Athénée une traduction en vers d’un fragment des Annales de Tacite, qui s’applique trop directement aux événements du jour.
 Réintégré dans ses fonctions l’année suivante par la protection de Maret, il est successivement secrétaire de François de Nantes, chef de la correspondance et du contentieux à l’administration générale des droits réunis, conseiller général de la Haute-Marne. Il est choisi, le 18 février 1807, par le Sénat conservateur, comme député de son département au Corps législatif.
 Roger fait partie du comité de l’instruction publique et devient, le 22 novembre 1809, par la protection de Louis de Fontanes, inspecteur général comptable de l’université. Il est un des plus empressés à applaudir au retour des Bourbons. Il devient inspecteur général des études le 21 février 1815. Destitué aux Cent-Jours, pour de violents articles contre Napoléon publiés dans le Journal général, il doit se cacher.
 Rétabli dans ses anciennes fonctions au retour de Gand, il est appelé aux fonctions de secrétaire général des postes le 12 septembre 1815. Il entre à l’Académie Française par ordonnance royale du 28 août 1817, en remplacement de Suard. En 1832, Louis XVIII lui octroie des lettres de noblesse.
 Élu, le 25 février 1824, député du 2e arrondissement électoral de la Haute-Marne (Langres), il vote avec la majorité ministérielle, et échoue, au renouvellement du 27 novembre 1827, et aux élections générales du 23 juin 1830. Il rentre à la Chambre, le 20 juillet 1830, élu par le grand collège de la Corse, avec 20 voix (37 votants).
 Après les journées de juillet, il est destitué de ses fonctions de secrétaire général des postes et voit en outre son élection invalidée. Il se retire alors de la vie politique et se consacre à ses occupations littéraires. Roger collabore à la Biographie universelle. Il décède à Paris le 1er mars 1842. Il repose avec Henri-louis Roger (1809-1891), médecin, président de l’Académie de Médecine, président de l’association Générale des Médecins de France. (Source : Amis et passionnés du Père Lachaise).

François married Charlotte Denyse Hélène Laboureys (de). Charlotte was born on 2 Mar 1789 in Paris, Seine, France; died on 6 Apr 1829 in Paris, Seine, France; was buried in Cimetière du Père-Lachaise, Paris, Seine, France. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Notes:

Family and Education: b. 27 Mar. 1772, 1st s. of William Charles Colyear, 3rd Earl of Portmore [S], by Lady Mary Leslie, da. of John, 10th Earl of Rothes [S]. m. (1) 26 May 1793, Lady Mary Elizabeth Bertie (d. 10 Feb. 1797), da. and h. of Brownlow Bertie†, 5th Duke of Ancaster, 1s. d.v.p.; (2) 6 Sept. 1828, Frances, da. of William Murrells, s.p. suc. fa. as 4th Earl of Portmore [S] 15 Nov. 1823.

Offices Held: Col. R. North Lincs. militia 1795-d., brevet col. 1795.

Biography: Milsington came in for Boston after a contest in 1796, standing on the interest of his father-in-law the Duke of Ancaster. On 14 Dec. 1796 he was granted two weeks’ leave of absence for his private affairs. He voted for Pitt’s assessed taxes, 4 Jan. 1798, and is not known to have spoken or opposed government. His distractions after his wife’s death proved expensive: early in 1802 he had to pay £2,000 damages for crim. con. ‘with Mrs Jackson, daughter of Colonel Bishop’. He did not seek re-election that year.

He died on the Continent 18 Jan. 1835, whereupon the title became extinct. His only son, who in 1809 became heir to the Ancaster estate once he reached the age of 25, was murdered by banditti in Italy in 1819.

---

Lord Milsington was an English amateur cricketer who made six known appearances in first-class cricket matches from 1792 to 1799. He was mainly associated with Hampshire and was an early member of Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC). He held the office of Member of Parliament (M.P.) for Boston, Lincolnshire between 1796 and 1802.

18 January 1802, Kings Bench, London – Proceedings by Henry Jackson for damages for criminal conversation for seducing his wife Harriet Jackson, née Bishopp and getting her pregnant. Allowed judgment by default to go against him. Argued amount of damages. Damages fixed by jury at £ 2,000. Admitted paternity of child.

Thomas married Harriet BISHOPP. Harriet (daughter of Henry BISHOPP and Mary WICKER) was born about 1770; died before 1824. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Notes:

From: What happened to Parson John Ambrose and his family? (Joanne Major, 26 March 2014)

Juliana Catherine Colyear’s background and ancestry deserves to be examined and we make no apologies for going off at a tangent here and recording the story of her ancestors. Her mother was Harriet Bishopp, daughter of Colonel Henry (Harry) and Mrs Mary Bishopp of Sussex with illustrious family connections. Colonel Harry was the youngest son of Sir Cecil Bishopp and Harry’s sister Frances was the wife of Sir George Warren. In the September of 1791, at the age of 22, Harriet had married one Henry Jackson, reportedly an ’eminent solicitor’ and the two had settled down to married life. In 1793 Henry Jackson suffered a paralytic stroke and Harriet added the role of nurse to that of devoted wife up until July 1799 when she met Viscount Milsington at a ball thrown by Lady Charles Somerset. Milsington, or Thomas Charles Colyear, was the eldest son of the 3rd Earl of Portmore, his mother being a daughter of the Earl of Rothes and he had been married to Lady Mary Elizabeth Bertie, only child of Brownlow Bertie, the 5th Duke of Ancaster and heir to a fortune. One child had been born of that union, a son named Brownlow Charles Colyear in 1796 and Lady Mary Elizabeth had died the following year.

The acquaintance between Harriet Jackson and Lord Milsington was renewed the following summer at Ascot Races and Harriet passed Milsington off to her husband and his relations as the suitor of one of her unmarried sisters, a ruse that was totally believed by all concerned. Henry Jackson positively encouraged Milsington to spend time with his extended family, even inviting him to stay at his own house, keen to have a sister in law married to an heir to an Earldom, never thinking he was being cuckolded. Months passed and by the summer of 1801 Jackson was beginning to suspect that something was amiss, the expected marriage proposal to Miss Bishopp not having materialized and he ordered his wife to break off the friendship and not to allow him to visit again. He left it to his wife to decide how to break this news to Milsington. Faced with the prospect of having to break off contact with her lover, Harriet was distraught and there was an added complication. She had a child, one that although recognized as the legitimate child of her husband, had been born since she had begun her relationship with Lord Milsington (she had fallen pregnant before this but it had resulted in a miscarriage). Milsington expressed his wish to look after her and her child and on the 4th August 1801 she ran away from her husband’s house and eloped with her lover. It is not known whether she took the child with her.

Henry Jackson instituted a criminal conversation or ‘crim. con.’ trial against Lord Milsington and this was heard on the 9th January 1802. The Miss Bishopp whom Milsington had supposedly been paying his attentions to did not appear, through reasons of delicacy, and various witnesses were examined. They all expressed surprise at the elopement, having no idea of the attachment and no evidence was produced against Milsington apart from a letter to his ‘beloved’ and ‘adored’ Harriet which was found in a drawer of her desk.

I hope most earnestly very soon to see that my beloved Harriet was not the worse for the expedition of yesterday. I wished very much to have called this morning, to have inquired after her, but thought if I did, I should not have the pleasure of passing the evening with the only woman in the world that I have the smallest attachment to, an attachment so strong and fixed, that nothing in the world can alter. I never can be happy till we live together, with that dear little angel that so resembles the figure of its dearest mother; it makes me quite miserable, the thoughts of leaving town; I cannot bear to be separated from you, my love; I hope it will not be the case; I am sure we could be happy together, and my only study the happiness of you, my adored Harriet, and the welfare of your children. Pray, my love, let me see you to-morrow if it is in your power. I wish very, very much, that we may meet to fix when we shall meet not to part again. Perhaps you will not have an opportunity of reading this before I am obliged to leave you, therefore I will be in Hart-street, at the usual place, at twelve o’clock to-morrow; pray come as soon after as you can; and believe me most sincerely, affectionately, and faithfully, yours ever, M.

Henry Jackson won the case, being awarded £2,000 damages for the loss of his wife’s affections and society, with Milsington having to pay the costs of the case too.

The Portsmouth Telegraph or Mottley’s Naval and Military Journal reported on the 18th January 1802, shortly after the close of the trial that:

Parmesan and prunelloes seem to be exploded in crim.con. fashions. It appeared on a late trial, that Lord Milsington made his way to the heart of Mrs. Jackson by the means of Sandwiches at Ascot Races. The favourite food of the frail fair has changed much since the original apple.

Seven children were born to Lord Milsington and Harriet Jackson, all out of wedlock. Sod’s Law decrees that the only two for whom we can find no record of their birth or baptism includes Juliana Catherine, the one we are most interested in, but we can record her siblings here.

– Mary Ann Colyear, born 6th June 1802 (died a spinster)
– Thomas David Colyear, born 15th May 1805 (died 8th August 1875 at Dekani near Simlar, Lt Col of the 7th Bengal Light Infantry)
– Charles Frederick Colyear, born 12th June 1806 (married Matilda Frances Winsor at St. Marylebone in 1828)
– Martin Thomas Colyear, born 26th May 1807 (sent out a cadet in the East India Co. army c.1822 and died at Dum Dum, Bengal, on the 13th February 1827)
– Elinor Mary Colyear, born 8th July 1808 (married Jerome Francis Edouard Roger in 1829, possibly died 1878)
– Harriet Frances Colyear (married André Libert Romain Viollet, a professor of languages, died January 1888).

It is worth noting that Juliana Catherine stated that she was 27 years old in 1833 at the birth registration of her daughter Emma in Nantes, putting her birth around 1806. It is more likely that she was actually born 1803-1804 and was knocking a couple of years off her age.

There is also an interesting baptism on the 8th September 1814 at St. Martin in the Fields, Westminster, for a Catherine Marianne Colyear, daughter of Thomas Charles Colyear and Elizabeth Penny, possibly another child by a different mother.

At the time of Milsington’s marriage with his first wife, the heiress of the 5th Duke of Ancaster, a sum of £38,000 had been settled on the couple jointly. Milsington, often to be found at the races in esteemed company, including the Prince of Wales and Sir John Lade, quickly found himself in embarrassed circumstances and had borrowed £10,000 from an army agent, Mr Bruce, signing over to him his interest in various annuities and rent charges.

The Duke of Ancaster duly died in 1809 and left his property (but not his estate or titles) to his only grandson, Brownlow Charles Colyear, the terms of the will stating that Brownlow should receive some of the money when he came of age and the remainder when he reached 25 years. Upon coming into some of his inheritance on his twenty-first birthday, Brownlow agreed to pay some off his father’s debts and obtained a decree against Mr Bruce ordering a reassignment of the interest. Obviously fond of his half-brothers and sisters even though he had grown up at the Bertie estate of Grimsthorpe Castle in Lincolnshire, he agreed that £20,000 out of the £38,000 should be put aside for portions for these sisters.

Brownlow never reached his twenty-fifth birthday. He undertook the ‘Grand Tour’ in 1802 and at Gensano whilst on the road to Rome from Naples, armed banditti rushed out from the cover of a nearby wood and ambushed his carriage, murdering his servants and wounding Brownlow by slashing his arm with a sabre whilst they stole a ring from his finger. Leaving the dead behind they took Brownlow into the mountains, intending to hold him to ransom, but he died of his wounds and of shock three days later aged only 22 years. The other occupants of the carriage arrived, destitute of everything they owned, at Rome some days later, claiming that a post of troops on the road, there to ensure the safety of travellers, had refused to help them. Brownlow’s body was taken to Naples and thence on to England where he was buried, at Weybridge, on the 28th July 1819.

Brownlow Charles Colyear had left his father his entire property but he had died before the executory agreements on the settlement for his half-sisters had been carried into effect and this proved disastrous for those half-sisters. The money from the settlement had been invested in funds which were sold and Milsington, by now the Earl of Portmore had allowed his solicitor, Mr Sermon, to receive the proceeds and to pay Mr Bruce what he was owed. Of the £20,000 which had been promised, £19,000 remained in Mr Sermon’s hands and the seven natural Colyear children, of which Juliana was one, claimed their inheritance but the Countess of Mulgrave, the widow of the surviving trustee of the settlement, blocked this.

Juliana’s unmarried sister, Mary Ann Colyear, began a law suit in 1820 on behalf of her and her three sisters to recover this money. Their father, the Earl of Portmore, died in January 1835, after having made a second marriage in 1828 to Frances, daughter of William Murrells, and the legal case was still rumbling on. The Earl seemed to have changed his mind about the provision for his daughters; perhaps it had been a condition of his second marriage for his wife to have a settlement upon her but he now wanted to money to be used for her benefit. His sons were provided for, two having joined the East India Company’s army and Charles Frederick joining the regular army.